Document Type : Original article
Authors
1 Dental Research Center, Dentistry Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2 Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Disease, Faculty of Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, International Campus, Tehran, Iran
3 Department of Community Oral Health, Faculty of Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
4 Dentist
Abstract
Keywords
Introduction
Oral cancer plays an important role in all populations around the world, especially in the South and Central Asia 1. World Health Organization (WHO) has published its global goals which is planned to be achieved by 2020, and WHO expects that there must be a reduction in the death rate of oral cancers 1.
Cancer is the third leading cause of death in Iran and more than 30,000 people die each year from cancer 2. 264 new female cases of oral and lacrimal cancers, with an incidence of 1 in 100,000 (the 17th most common cancer in women) and 386 male cases, with an incidence of 1.3 cases per 100,000 (the 13th most common cancer in men) were registered in Iran in 2004. Deaths from oral cavity cancer in Iran were 171 cases based on the death report in 23 provinces of which 98 and 73 cases were men and women, respectively. It was the fifth most common cancer in Iranian deaths 2.
Head and neck cancer is the sixth common cancer in the world, of which the oral cavity is the most common one. Epidemiological studies show that oral cavity cancers are among the top ten causes of men’s mortality in the worldwide. More than 90% of the oral cavity cancers are Squamous Cell Carcinoma (SCC) of tongue, floor of mouth and lips. Laryngeal cancer is the second most common cancer in the upper aero digestive tracts 3. Gneep 4 reported that the most common type of pharyngeal malignancy (about 95%) was SCC and tonsils were the most common source of tumor.
Sargeran 5 conducted a study on the malignant features of the mouth and lip cancers in 1042 patients from Tehran between years 1993 and 2003. He reported that SCC was the most common oral and lip malignancy with a five-year survival rate of 30%, which is 60% lower than the global mean while the mean time of delay in diagnosis was 7.2 months.
In a study by Maleki et al, the male/female ratio for oral cancer was 1.91. Tongue with average percentage of 29.9 was the most involved site. Regarding microscopic grade, 65.7% of cases were grade 1. SCCs accounted for an average of 70.0% of cases, making it the most common type of oral cancer 6.
Meanwhile, Antoniades 7 claim that lips are the most common site of SCC in the mouth (59.4%); other studies claimed that tongue was the most common affected organ in oral cavity. Kowalski 8 studied the metastasis rate of patients with oral malignancies after the initial treatment and found that 3.8% of patients showed distant metastasis.
Health statistics from Iran show that more than 70,000 new cases of cancer occur yearly and also due to an increase in life expectancy, the percentage of the elderly in the country is quickly growing which in turn increases the incidence of cancer in the next decades 2. Therefore it is necessary to have accurate statistics of cancer prevalence and incidence in different geographical areas. This study has been carried out in order to achieve the prevalence of oral and throat malignancies in a 5-year period from information obtained from some of the cancer treatment centers of Tehran.
Moreover, this retrospective study reports some clinical characteristics of oral cancers such as age, gender, location, and type of lesion.
Patients and Methods
This research is a descriptive-analytic cross-sectional study. Of 100 hospitals in Tehran, 30 hospitals are involved in the treatment of oral cancers 5 and in this research, the main centers for oral and thoracic cancers were introduced by medical universities of capital city of Tehran including Shahid Beheshti University, Iran University, and Shahed University. These universities allowed their cancer centers contribute to this research including Imam Khomeini Educational Hospital, Institute of Cancer and Amiralam Hospital from Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Imam Hossein and Taleghani Hospitals from Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, and Hazrate Rasool Akram Hospital and Physiotherapy Hospitals of Iran University of Medical Sciences.
The selection of centers was based on the following criteria: the archival system of the centers, their specialties in treatment of oral cancers and their tension of using a supervising professor who was expert in that regard. The selected centers are Shohada-e-Tajrish Hospital from Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Firoozgar Hospital from Tehran University of Medical Sciences and Taleghani Hospital from Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences. It should be noted that due to lack of suitable hospital from Shahed University to meet our criteria, this university was excluded from the study. Then all records of patients with oral cancer from the included centers were studied in in a period of 5 months from 2001 to 2005. Clinical characteristics of patients and malignant tumors of the oral cavity and pharynx were extracted from patients’ medical files including age at onset, gender, locations, and type of the lesion.
Of a total 260 cases, 256 were selected to be included in this study. We used two methods to collect the required data. The first method was to fill out prepared forms from the patients’ files and the second method was to fill in the incomplete records by phoning the patients. Another goal of contacting patients was to examine the health status of patients after treatment. Forms for importing data were designed and some of the variables were coded to facilitate data collection procedures. An ICDO-coding system was used to enter data of malignant lesions. After completing the forms, final data were entered into the SPSS computer software for statistical analysis. A frequency table was prepared for each variable under study. In addition to the general frequency of each variable, the specific frequency of that variable for each lesion was also determined and included separately.
Results
Of the 260, 4 cases were excluded due to information defects or repeatability. 159 (62.1%) were male and 97 (37.9%) were female. In the case of SCC, 62.8% were male and 37.2% were female. In terms of age distribution, most of them were between their fifth and eighth decades of life (Table 1). The mean age at onset for SCC was 62 years and 36 years for Mucoepidermoid Carcinoma (MEC) (Table 2).
Table 1. The prevalence of oral and pharyngeal cancers in each decade
Decade |
Percentage |
5th decade |
11 |
6th decade |
20.1 |
7th decade |
25.2 |
8th decade |
22.4 |
The most common site of SCC was tongue (25.8%) and larynx (15.2%), respectively. In the case of MEC, the most common sites were palate (42.9%) and gum (21.4%). Out of all SCC cases, 25% recurred. The most common site of recurrence was the tongue (9.7%). Of the 23 metastatic cases (11.3%), 14 cases were originally SCC (Table 3).
The occupations of patients were: 31 farmers, 81 housewives, 2 military personnel, 5 students, 12 employees, 36 retired, 18 workers, 10 unemployed, 3 drivers, 15 self-employed, and 3 others (Table 4). Jobs of the rest were not mentioned. In terms of the overall prevalence of lesions, 70.3% of cases were SCC, followed by MEC, lymphoma and adenocarcinoma, which were 5.5, 4.3 and 4.3%, respectively (Table 5).
Table 3. Frequency of malignant oral lesions based on the location
Total |
Cranial nerves |
Connective tissue |
Faceskin |
Facebone |
Larynx |
Pharynx |
Tonsils |
Other major glands |
Parotid gland |
Otherpartsof the mucus |
Cavity |
Mouth |
Gum |
Tongue |
Lowerlip |
|
|
178 |
0 |
1 |
6 |
2 |
27 |
14 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
38 |
4 |
17 |
15 |
46 |
6 |
Number |
SCC |
100 |
0 |
0.6 |
3.4 |
1.1 |
15.2 |
7.9 |
1.1 |
0 |
0 |
21.3 |
2.2 |
9.6 |
8.4 |
25.8 |
3.4 |
Total percentages (%) |
|
3 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Number |
BCC |
100 |
0 |
0 |
33.3 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
33.3 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
33.3 |
0 |
Total percentages (%) |
|
14 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
6 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
Number |
MEC |
100 |
0 |
0 |
7.1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
7.1 |
14.3 |
7.1 |
42.9 |
0 |
21.4
|
0 |
0 |
Total percentages (%) |
|
11 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
3 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Number |
Adenocarcinoma |
100 |
0 |
0 |
9.1 |
9.1 |
0 |
18.2 |
0 |
18.2 |
0 |
27.3 |
18.2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Total percentages (%) |
|
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Number |
Thalamic lymphatic carcinoma |
100 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
100 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Total percentages (%) |
|
11 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
0 |
4 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Number |
Lymphoma |
100 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
45.5 |
0 |
36.4 |
18.2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Total percentages (%) |
|
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Number |
Osteosarcoma |
100 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
50 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
50 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Total percentages (%) |
|
9 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
4 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
Number |
Melanoma |
100 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
11.1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
22.2 |
44.4 |
0 |
22.2
|
0 |
0 |
Total percentages (%) |
|
4 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
Number |
Soft tissue sarcoma |
100 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
25 |
0 |
25 |
0 |
25 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
25 |
0 |
Total percentages (%) |
|
21 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
15 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
Number |
Other malignancies, or unknown |
100 |
4/8 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4.8 |
71.4 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4.8 |
4.8 |
0 |
0 |
9.5 |
0 |
Total percentages (%) |
|
254 |
1 |
1 |
9 |
10 |
28 |
37 |
4 |
4 |
2 |
48 |
17 |
17 |
20 |
50 |
6 |
Number |
Total |
100 |
0.4 |
0.4 |
3.5 |
3.9 |
11 |
14.6 |
1.6 |
1.6 |
0.8 |
18.9 |
6.7 |
6.7 |
7.9 |
19.7 |
2.4 |
Total percentages (%) |
Table 4. The occupation of patients
Occupation |
No. |
Occupation |
No. |
Farmer |
31 |
Worker |
18 |
House wife |
81 |
Unemployed |
10 |
Military personnel |
2 |
Driver |
3 |
Student |
5 |
Self employed |
15 |
Employer |
12 |
Other |
3 |
Retired |
36 |
|
|
Table 5. Overall prevalence of lesions
Squamous Cell Carcinoma (SCC) |
70.3% |
Muccoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) |
5.5% |
Lymphoma |
4.3% |
Adenoma |
4.3% |
Discussion
Data from 256 cases were statistically analyzed and SCC was the most common oral-pharyngeal malignancy (73%), however Sargeran 5 reported this figure as 87%. Meanwhile, Hoffman 9 reported it as less than 55.8%. He also reported a prevalence of 19.4% for MEC as the second common malignancy. MEC is the most common malignancy of salivary glands and the second most common malignancy in our study, too. In our study it shown to consist more than half of the cases of salivary malignancies, which is similar to the findings of Sargeran et al 5 that worked on malignant oral tumors in Iran and Vargas et al 10 who worked on salivary gland tumors in Brazilian population.
We showed that most of the patients were male (62.1%) which is in concordance with two previous studies carried out by Moore 11 and Silverman 12 where they cited oral cancer as a male-dominated cancer. Parkin 13 also reported that two third of the cases of oral cancers were in men.
In the present study, 74% of malignancies were seen in people over 40 years of age. Literature also shows that most of these patients are over the age of 40 years 13-15. Generally, SCC is known as malignancy in elderly and usually happens after the fifth decade of life 7,16. The mean age at onset of SCC in this study was 62 years, which is similar to other Iranian studies 5.
The mean age for two other common malignancies including MEC and lymphoma were 36 and 47 years, respectively. In a study by Vargas et al 10, the mean age at onset for MEC and lymphoma were 37 and 52 years, respectively.
The most common site of malignancy in our study is tongue (19.7%), of which 25.8% were SCC. This finding is in agreement with other studies from other parts of the world 6,17. We reported recurrence of malignancy in 25 cases of SCC, one case of MEC and 5 patients with adenocarcinoma. The most frequent site of SCC recurrence was the tongue. The high incidence of recurrence in adenocarcinoma is consistent with Weing et al 18 report who claimed a recurrence rate of more than 30%.
Out of 203 cases in our study, 23 cases of metastasis occurred accounting for 11.3% of all cases. This rate is more than 8.3% that Kowalski 8 claimed in his report. The cause of the higher incidence of metastasis in the present study might be due to a higher stage of malignant tumors at the time of initial diagnosis. Moreover, due to the delayed referral and treatment, the likelihood of failure in treatment is higher which is associated with higher incidence of distant metastasis.
One of the important factors for oral cancer is type of the occupations. Some occupations are associated with longer exposure to sunlight, especially no sheltered occupations 19,20. We found that farmers, drivers, open-space workers and military people were at higher risk because 54 (24%) of the subjects were in the above-mentioned high risk jobs.
Conclusion
We believe that knowing the epidemiologic status of these cancers may help removing the barriers and problems present in the health system in order to minimize the delay in diagnosis and treatment of oral cavity cancers. This also improves the quality of the life of affected patient.
To improve the status of cancer registry systems, we suggest that: 1) Medical staff should be more careful in filling and recording the initial symptoms of patients and their risk factors, 2) More attention must be paid by medical and dental practitioners in identifying the potential lesions and such staff must receive sufficient training in terms of knowing the symptoms and risk of oral and pharyngeal cancers and 3) Cancer registry officials should pay more attention to oral and thoracic cancers as major cancer burden with high economic and social burdens.