Journal of Iranian Medical Council

Journal of Iranian Medical Council

The Pathophysiological Insights and Emerging Biomarkers in Psoriasis: A Comprehensive Review

Document Type : Review article

Authors
1 School of Pharmacy, Sharda University, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India 201310
2 Amity Institute of Pharmacy, Amity University, Gwalior, Madhya Pradesh, India 474005
Abstract
Psoriasis is a chronic, immune-mediated inflammatory skin disorder affecting 2-3% of the global population. It imposes a substantial burden on patients due to its relapsing nature, lifelong management, and association with systemic comorbidities, including psoriatic arthritis, cardiovascular diseases, and metabolic syndrome. The unpredictable disease course and heterogeneity in treatment response necessitate the identification of reliable biomarkers to enhance clinical decision-making. Biomarkers hold promise in refining diagnosis, assessing disease severity, predicting treatment outcomes, and enabling precision dermatology in psoriasis management. Recent advancements in multiomics research have led to the discovery of potential psoriasis biomarkers, including genetic markers (HLA-C* 06:02), inflammatory cytokines (IL-17, IL-23, TNF-α), proteomic and metabolomic signatures, and skin microbiome alterations. These biomarkers correlate with disease activity, therapy responsiveness, and risk of comorbid conditions, thereby facilitating personalized treatment approaches. Despite promising findings, their routine clinical application remains limited due to variability in study methodologies, lack of standardization, and insufficient large-scale validation. The future of biomarker-driven dermatology in psoriasis depends on the integration of molecular profiling, standardized validation protocols, and clinical trials to establish their predictive and prognostic utility. Regulatory approval and widespread clinical adoption require rigorous validation and harmonization of biomarker assessment techniques. Establishing a clinically reliable biomarker panel could revolutionize psoriasis management by enabling targeted therapies, optimizing treatment efficacy, and minimizing adverse effects. This review aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of the current landscape of psoriasis biomarkers, their clinical relevance, and future directions for their standardization and integration into precision dermatology.
Keywords

Subjects


Abstract 
Psoriasis is a chronic, immune-mediated inflammatory skin disorder affecting 2-3% of the global population. It imposes a substantial burden on patients due to its relapsing nature, lifelong management, and association with systemic comorbidities, including psoriatic arthritis, cardiovascular diseases, and metabolic syndrome. The unpredictable disease course and heterogeneity in treatment response necessitate the identification of reliable biomarkers to enhance clinical decision-making. Biomarkers hold promise in refining diagnosis, assessing disease severity, predicting treatment outcomes, and enabling precision dermatology in psoriasis management. Recent advancements in multiomics research have led to the discovery of potential psoriasis biomarkers, including genetic markers (HLA-C* 06:02), inflammatory cytokines (IL-17, IL-23, TNF-α), proteomic and metabolomic signatures, and skin microbiome alterations. These biomarkers correlate with disease activity, therapy responsiveness, and risk of comorbid conditions, thereby facilitating personalized treatment approaches. Despite promising findings, their routine clinical application remains limited due to variability in study methodologies, lack of standardization, and insufficient large-scale validation. The future of biomarker-driven dermatology in psoriasis depends on the integration of molecular profiling, standardized validation protocols, and clinical trials to establish their predictive and prognostic utility. Regulatory approval and widespread clinical adoption require rigorous validation and harmonization of biomarker assessment techniques. Establishing a clinically reliable biomarker panel could revolutionize psoriasis management by enabling targeted therapies, optimizing treatment efficacy, and minimizing adverse effects. This review aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of the current landscape of psoriasis biomarkers, their clinical relevance, and future directions for their standardization and integration into precision dermatology.

Keywords: Clinical relevance, Dermatology, Genetic markers, Interleukin-17, Proteomics, Psoriasis 

Introduction
Psoriasis is a persistent inflammatory dermatologic disorder, impacting approximately 2–3% of the global population (1-3). Clinically, it manifests as erythematous, scaly plaques, primarily resulting from accelerated keratinocyte proliferation and immune system activation. Although traditionally considered a skin condition, psoriasis is now recognized for its systemic implications, as it is commonly associated with psoriatic arthritis, cardiovascular disease, metabolic syndrome, and mental health disorders (4,5) (Table 1). These comorbidities elevate the burden of the disease, complicating patient management, and often necessitating lifelong therapeutic interventions (6). The underlying pathogenesis of psoriasis is multifactorial, involving a dynamic interaction between genetic predispositions, immune system dysregulation, and environmental triggers. Central to the inflammatory process are immune cells, particularly T-helper 17 (Th17) cells, and cytokines such as IL-17, IL-23, and TNF-α (7,8). These mediators promote an inflammatory cascade that drives both the local skin lesions and the systemic effects of the disease. Genetic factors, such as the HLA-C06:02 allele, have been identified as the key contributors to psoriasis susceptibility, while immune-mediated pathways are responsible for the disease’s chronic nature and variability in clinical expression and response to treatment (9,10). This complexity necessitates the identification of accurate biomarkers to assist in diagnosis, monitor disease progression, predict therapeutic responses, and enable more personalized treatment plans. Emerging biomarkers in psoriasis research span a wide spectrum, including genetic markers, inflammatory mediators, proteomic and metabolomic signatures, and shifts in the skin microbiome (11,12). Notably, the HLA-C06:02 allele and cytokines like IL-17, IL-23, and TNF-α correlate with disease severity and treatment outcomes. Advances in proteomics and metabolomics have also uncovered potential circulating biomarkers that may serve as indicators of disease activity or therapeutic efficacy (13). However, the clinical integration of these biomarkers remains limited by factors such as inter-patient variability, inconsistent research methodologies, and a lack of standardized validation across diverse populations. Overcoming these challenges and integrating multiomics data with rigorous clinical validation holds the potential to significantly advance psoriasis management. The successful incorporation of biomarkers into clinical practice could ultimately enable more targeted therapies, improve treatment response, and reduce side effects, ushering in an era of precision dermatology (14-16).

Pathophysiology of psoriasis
Psoriasis is a chronic, immune-mediated inflammatory skin disorder characterized by abnormal keratinocyte proliferation, impaired differentiation, and persistent immune activation. The disease results from a complex interaction between genetic predisposition, environmental factors, and immune system dysregulation, leading to epidermal hyperplasia and chronic inflammation. The key driver of psoriasis pathophysiology is an overactive immune response involving innate and adaptive immune mechanisms, where dendritic cells, T cells, neutrophils, and keratinocytes engage in a self-sustaining inflammatory cycle. The IL-23/IL-17 axis has emerged as the primary pathway responsible for disease chronicity, orchestrating the inflammatory cascade that leads to psoriatic plaque formation and systemic involvement (6,-7,17). The summary of psoriasis pathophysiology is shown in table 2.

Immune system dysregulation in psoriasis
Psoriasis is an immune-mediated condition where both innate and adaptive immune responses contribute to disease initiation and progression. The innate immune system plays a role in the early stages of disease by triggering an inflammatory response, while adaptive immunity sustains chronic inflammation (18).

Innate immune activation
The innate immune system is the first line of defence against external triggers, playing a critical role in initiating psoriatic inflammation. Plasmacytoid Dendritic Cells (pDCs) are abnormally activated in psoriatic skin, recognizing self-DNA and RNA complexes bound to antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) such as LL37 (cathelicidin). These immune com-plexes activate Toll-like receptors (TLR7 and TLR9) on pDCs, leading to the secretion of type I interferons (IFN-α and IFN-β), which, in turn, activate myeloid Dendritic Cells (mDCs). Once activated, mDCs secrete IL-12 and IL-23, which promote the differentiation of Th1 and Th17 cells, respectively (19-20).

Adaptive immune activation and the IL-23/IL-17 Axis
The IL-23/IL-17 axis plays a central role in sustaining psoriatic inflammation. IL-23, produced by dendritic cells and macrophages, promotes the expansion and survival of Th17 cells, which secrete IL-17A, IL-17F, and IL-22. IL-17A stimulates keratinocyte proliferation and enhances the release of inflammatory mediators, further attracting immune cells into psoriatic lesions. IL-22 contributes to epidermal thickening by promoting keratinocyte survival and abnormal differentiation (21-22). Additionally, TNF-α and IFN-γ further amplify inflammation, sustaining a chronic immune response. Normally, regulatory T cells (Tregs) counteract excessive immune activation, but in psoriasis, Treg function is impaired, allowing unchecked Th17-driven inflammation.

Keratinocyte dysfunction and epidermal hyperplasia
A hallmark of psoriasis is keratinocyte hyperpro-liferation and altered differentiation, leading to thickened, scaly plaques. Histopathologically, psoriatic skin exhibits acanthosis (epidermal thick-ening), parakeratosis (retention of nuclei in the stratum corneum), elongation of rete ridges, and loss of the granular layer. IL-17A and IL-22 stimulate keratinocytes to proliferate excessively, while simul-taneously impairing differentiation, resulting in abnormal barrier function and enhanced immune activation. Additionally, keratinocytes themselves act as immune-active cells, producing cytokines such as IL-1, IL-6, and TNF-α, which recruit additional inflammatory cells, reinforcing chronic inflammation (23,24).

Role of antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) in psoriasis
AMPs play a dual role in immune defence and auto-immunity by both protecting against infections and contributing to chronic inflammation. In psoriasis, AMPs such as LL37, β-defensins, and S100 proteins are overexpressed, amplifying immune responses. LL37 forms immune-stimulatory complexes with self-DNA and self-RNA, triggering pDC activation via TLR7/9 and leading to the persistent production of IFN-α, which enhances Th17-driven inflammation. β-Defensins and S100 proteins act as chemoattractants, drawing more immune cells into psoriatic lesions and exacerbating the disease process. This self-sustaining cycle of AMP overexpression, immune activation, and keratinocyte dysfunction is a fundamental component of psoriasis pathophysiology (25-27).

Angiogenesis and vascular abnormalities in psoriasis
Psoriatic lesions exhibit increased angiogenesis and vascular remodelling, contributing to erythema, immune cell infiltration, and chronic inflammation. VEGF is highly upregulated in psoriatic skin, promoting neovascularization, capillary dilation, and endothelial dysfunction. This vascular remodelling facilitates the migration of immune cells into psoriatic plaques, reinforcing inflammation. Additionally, the dilated and inflamed blood vessels sustain immune cell trafficking, worsening disease progression (28, 29).

Genetic susceptibility and environmental triggers
Genetic predisposition plays a significant role in the development of psoriasis. The strongest genetic association is with HLA-C*06:02, which is involved in antigen presentation and T-cell activation. Other implicated genes include IL23R, TNFAIP3, STAT3, TYK2, and LCE3B/C, which regulate cytokine signalling, NF-κB activation, and epidermal barrier function. Environmental factors such as infections, trauma (Koebner phenomenon), psychological stress, and medications [β-blockers, lithium, Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs), antimalarials] can act as triggers, exacerbating inflammation and inducing disease flares. These external stimuli ac-tivate innate immune responses, leading to dendritic cell activation, cytokine secretion, and immune cell recruitment, contributing to disease progression (26, 30).

The IL-23/IL-17 axis and chronic inflammation
The IL-23/IL-17 axis is the most critical inflammatory pathway in psoriasis, responsible for its chronicity. IL-23 secreted by dendritic cells maintains Th17 cell differentiation, leading to continuous IL-17A and IL-17F production. These cytokines stimulate keratinocytes to produce additional inflammatory mediators, perpetuating a self-amplifying inflam-matory loop. IL-22 further drives epidermal hyperplasia, while TNF-α and IFN-γ enhance immune cell recruitment and cytokine secretion. The synergistic effects of these pro-inflammatory mediators lead to persistent inflammation, keratinocyte overactivity, and chronic plaque formation (31-33).

Advancements in psoriasis treatment
Understanding the pathophysiology of psoriasis has led to significant therapeutic advancements. Biologic therapies targeting IL-17, IL-23, and TNF-α have transformed disease management by disrupting key inflammatory pathways, reducing immune cell infiltration, and restoring immune homeostasis. These therapies not only improve skin lesions but also help mitigate systemic inflammation and associated comorbidities. However, challenges remain in identifying biomarkers for treatment response, necessitating further research into precision medicine approaches (35).

Treatment of psoriasis 
The treatment of psoriasis has evolved with a range of therapeutic strategies. Currently available oral systemic therapies include retinoids like acitretin, which is effective with a PASI75 response of 47-53%, though it carries side effects like dry mouth and liver enzyme elevations (36). Methotrexate inhibits dihydrofolate reductase, offering a PASI75 response of 45.2%, but also presents risks such as nausea and liver issues. Cyclosporine A, a calcineurin inhibitor, shows a PASI75 response between 50-97% but can cause nephrotoxicity and increased infection risk. Apremilast, a PDE4 inhibitor, offers a PASI75 response of 33.1% but has side effects like diarrhea and depression. Biologic therapies include TNFα inhibitors like infliximab and adalimumab, with PASI75 responses around 80%, though they carry risks of infections and reactivation of conditions like hepatitis. IL23 inhibitors, such as Ustekinumab and Guselkumab, have demonstrated PASI75 responses ranging from 67.5 to 91.2%, with mild side effects such as nasopharyngitis. IL17 inhibitors like secukinumab and ixekizumab provide PASI75 responses between 77.1% and 90%, but with risks of candidiasis and other severe effects. RORγt inhibitors like VTP-43742, though promising, were halted due to liver toxicity (36-38). The IL36 receptor antagonist BI 655130 has been effective in treating generalized pustular psoriasis with symptom reduction over 20 weeks. JAK inhibitors, such as tofacitinib and baricitinib, block inflammatory signalling and show PASI75 responses of 39.5-81.1%, though they are associated with cardiovascular risks. Sphingosine-1-Phosphate (S1P) agonists like ponesimod also indicate efficacy with PASI75 responses of 46-77%, but with concerns over side effects like lymphopenia and bradycardia (39). The ROCK2 inhibitor KD025, which is still under study, shows potential in reducing psoriasis symptoms through inhibition of cell signalling pathways. This array of treatments reflects the broad spectrum of current therapeutic approaches for managing psoriasis. Basic pharmacological treatment is shown in table 3 (40).

Biomarkers in psoriasis 
Insights for diagnosis and treatment: For biomarkers to be truly effective in the diagnosis and management of psoriasis, they should exhibit several essential characteristics. Specificity is paramount, as an ideal biomarker should be able to clearly identify psoriasis and distinguish it from other inflammatory skin conditions, such as eczema or seborrheic dermatitis. This ensures that the biomarker provides accurate results without false positives. Sensitivity is equally important, as it allows for the detection of psoriasis even in its early stages or subclinical forms, when the disease may not yet be visually apparent (41). Early detection is crucial for initiating timely interventions to prevent further progression. Additionally, reproducibility plays a critical role; biomarkers should produce consistent results across various laboratories and clinical settings to ensure the reliability and generalization of findings. Another key attribute is predictive power, which refers to a biomarker’s ability to forecast the disease course, potential flare-ups, or response to treatment. This capability can guide therapeutic decisions and help personalize treatment plans for better outcomes (42). Finally, accuracy is necessary to ensure that the biomarker reflects the underlying biological processes of psoriasis without interference from other health conditions, thus providing a true representation of the disease (43). The methods employed for biomarker detection should also meet certain standards to be effective in clinical practice. Robustness is essential, as the detection technique should yield consistent and reliable results even under varying laboratory conditions. This ensures the biomarker’s applicability across both routine clinical practice and research settings. Standardization of detection methods is equally important to ensure uniform application across different healthcare environments, which supports the integration of biomarkers into clinical practice guidelines. Moreover, simplicity is a key factor in the adoption of detection methods. The assays for biomarker detection should be straightforward, reducing technical complexity and enhancing their feasibility for routine clinical use (44). Biomarkers play a crucial role in psoriasis management, offering significant applications in diagnosis, disease monitoring, and treatment optimization. They can assist in distinguishing psoriasis from other dermatologic conditions, enabling more accurate diagnosis and early intervention. Furthermore, biomarkers are vital in monitoring disease progression and assessing treatment efficacy. By tracking changes in biomarker levels over time, clinicians can identify flare-ups, anticipate future exacerbations, and adjust treatment plans accordingly. Additionally, certain biomarkers have the potential to predict a patient’s response to specific therapies, such as biologic treatments, thereby facilitating personalized medicine (45). By identifying patients who are more likely to benefit from particular treatments, biomarkers can help optimize therapeutic regimens for improved outcomes.

Classification of biomarkers in psoriasis
Psoriasis is a multifaceted, chronic inflammatory disorder of the skin, characterized by excessive keratinocyte proliferation, immune dysregulation, and heightened cytokine activity. The pursuit of identifying biomarkers in psoriasis has become integral in understanding its complex pathogenesis and optimizing clinical management. Biomarkers in psoriasis can be broadly categorized into genetic, tissue-associated, soluble, comorbidity-related, and treatment-response biomarkers. These markers hold promise not only for enhancing diagnostic accuracy and evaluating disease progression but also for tailoring individualized therapeutic strategies and improving patient outcomes (46). The summary of biomarker shown in table 4.
Genetic biomarkers: The genetic basis of psoriasis has been extensively studied, unveiling several loci that influence susceptibility and disease severity. One of the most significant genetic markers identified is PSORS1, which encodes the HLA-CW6 gene. This gene plays a pivotal role in T-cell activation, thereby initiating the inflammatory cascade responsible for the epidermal hyperplasia typical of psoriasis (47-49). The HLA-CW6 allele is strongly linked to early-onset psoriasis and more severe disease phenotypes. In addition, genetic loci like PSORS4, associated with genes regulating keratinocyte differentiation, have been identified. S100 calcium-binding proteins, encoded by genes linked to PSORS4, are instrumental in inflammation and cellular stress, both of which are dysregulated in psoriatic skin. Furthermore, polymorphisms in genes such as IL23R, IL12B, IL23A, and TNFAIP3, central to the Th17 immune response, have been implicated in psoriasis pathogenesis. Understanding these genetic factors not only advances insights into the mechanisms underlying psoriasis but also paves the way for targeted therapies aimed at modulating these immune pathways for improved disease management (50,51).
Tissue-associated biomarkers: Tissue-associated biomarkers offer a comprehensive understanding of psoriasis at the cellular and histopathological levels. The Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) is a key clinical tool used to assess the extent and intensity of psoriatic lesions, thus quantifying disease severity. However, its limitations—such as inter-observer variability and time-consuming evaluations—necessitate the use of complementary diagnostic methods. Skin biopsy, for instance, remains indispensable in both diagnosis and prognosis. Histopathological analysis of psoriatic lesions often reveals several markers crucial for understanding the disease process. Keratin 16 (K16) is frequently upregulated in psoriatic skin, serving as a reliable marker of keratinocyte proliferation and abnormal differentiation. Its expression correlates with disease activity, indicating its potential as a prognostic biomarker. Additionally, vascular changes in psoriatic lesions, such as increased angiogenesis, reflect ongoing inflammation. Markers like CD31 and VEGF are used to evaluate angiogenesis in psoriatic plaques, further linking immune system activation to skin vascularity. These tissue-based biomarkers are indispensable for monitoring disease progression and assessing the effectiveness of therapies aimed at modulating inflammation and keratinocyte turnover (52,53).
Soluble biomarkers: Soluble biomarkers, detectable in body fluids like blood, offer a non-invasive means of monitoring disease activity and treatment response in psoriasis. Human Beta Defensins (hBD-2), antimicrobial peptides, are significantly elevated in the lesional skin of psoriasis patients. These peptides play an integral role in the innate immune response by activating immune cells such as dendritic cells and neutrophils, which contribute to the chronic inflammation seen in psoriasis. Elevated levels of hBD-2 correlate with disease severity, making it a promising marker for monitoring disease activity and treatment efficacy. Other soluble biomarkers, such as S100 proteins (specifically S100A7, S100A8, and S100A9), are upregulated in psoriasis and aid in the recruitment of immune cells to sites of inflammation (54,55). These proteins act as pro-inflammatory mediators, amplifying the immune response. Increased serum levels of S100 proteins have been associated with greater disease severity, and thus, they may serve as indicators of active inflammation. Additionally, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF), involved in angiogenesis, contributes to the inflammatory milieu. Lipocalin-2 (LCN2) and YKL-40, two other soluble markers, reflect systemic inflammation and are linked to psoriasis and its comorbidities, particularly in relation to IL-17 activity (56).
Biomarkers for Comorbidities: Psoriasis is frequently associated with comorbidities such as cardiovascular disease, metabolic syndrome, and obesity. Identifying biomarkers that predict the presence and risk of these comorbidities is essential for holistic management of psoriasis. GlycA, a marker of systemic inflammation, has been identified as a potential predictor of cardiovascular risk in psoriasis patients. Elevated GlycA levels correlate with psoriasis severity and the presence of cardiovascular comorbidities, suggesting its potential role in identifying patients at higher cardiovascular risk. Similarly, Psoriasin (S100A7), involved in the inflammatory response, is elevated in psoriasis and has been implicated in both psoriasis pathophysiology and cardiovascular health. Elevated levels of NT-proBNP, a cardiac biomarker, are commonly found in psoriasis patients, indicating potential early cardiovascular dysfunction, including heart failure (57-63). Additionally, the increased oxidative stress in psoriasis contributes to a heightened risk of atherosclerosis. Biomarkers such as catalase and LDL antibodies are indicative of oxidative damage, further linking psoriasis to cardiovascular pathologies. These comorbidity-related biomarkers highlight the need for a comprehensive approach to managing psoriasis, addressing both cutaneous and systemic health (64-67).
Biomarkers for treatment response: The identification of biomarkers that predict treatment response is critical for optimizing psoriasis management. C-Reactive Protein (CRP) is widely used to assess systemic inflammation in psoriasis (68-71). Elevated CRP levels reflect active inflammation, whereas a decrease in CRP often signals clinical improvement, particularly with biologic therapies. Biological treatments targeting specific immune pathways, such as TNF-α inhibitors, have been shown to reduce CRP levels, correlating with symptom improvement. Furthermore, genetic markers like HLA-C06:02* have been associated with differential responses to treatment. Patients carrying the HLA-C06:02 allele tend to respond more favorably to biologics like Ustekinumab, which targets IL-12 and IL-23, key cytokines in psoriasis inflammation 72,73. Identifying HLA-C06:02* can help clinicians predict which patients are likely to benefit from such therapies, thus enabling more personalized treatment decisions. Moreover, monitoring the levels of Interleukin-17 (IL-17), a cytokine central to psoriasis inflammation, can provide valuable insights into treatment efficacy (74). A reduction in IL-17 levels following treatment is typically indicative of a favourable response, making it a useful biomarker for tracking disease progress and therapeutic success. Despite the potential of biomarkers in diagnosing and managing psoriasis, several challenges hinder their widespread use in clinical practice. Biomarkers like CRP, while useful for assessing inflammation, are non-specific and can be elevated in various inflammatory conditions, making it difficult to differentiate psoriasis from other diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis or Crohn’s disease. Genetic markers such as PSORS1 and HLA-CW6 are valuable but exhibit ethnic variability, limiting their general applicability across diverse populations. Additionally, tools like the Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) suffer from inter-observer variability, as different clinicians may assess disease severity differently, leading to inconsistent results. Early detection of psoriasis is also challenged by the sensitivity limitations of biomarkers like S100 proteins and hBD-2, which may not be elevated in the early stages of the disease. Furthermore, variability in detection methods and laboratory protocols can lead to inconsistent results, undermining the clinical utility of biomarkers. Finally, while biomarkers like IL-17 are associated with treatment responses, predicting individual outcomes remains complex due to the heterogeneity in patient reactions to therapies such as biologics, complicating the personalization of treatment.

Table 1. Clinical manifestations of psoriasis

Clinical manifestation

Clinical findings

Plaque psoriasis

This type is characterized by sharply defined erythematous plaques, usually more than 0.5 cm in diameter, often covered with silvery scales. It can present as isolated lesions or as a generalized form.

Scalp psoriasis

One of the most commonly affected areas, scalp psoriasis often features thick scaling and inflammation, making it particularly difficult to treat.

Palmoplantar psoriasis

Affects the palms of the hands and soles of the feet, presenting with varying degrees of redness and scaling, from poorly defined fissured areas to large plaques.

Flexural psoriasis

Also known as intertriginous or inverse psoriasis, it presents with thin, minimally scaly plaques in skin folds like the axillary, groin, genital, and inframammary regions.

Nail psoriasis

Nail involvement may occur without visible skin lesions and is marked by pitting, subungual hyperkeratosis, oil drop sign, distal onycholysis, and splinter haemorrhages. Nail psoriasis is a strong indicator for psoriatic arthritis.

Guttate psoriasis

Typically appearing as small, salmon-pink, scaly papules resembling “dew drops” on the trunk or limbs, often following an episode of group A streptococcal throat infection or perianal dermatitis.

Pustular psoriasis

Characterized by clusters of sterile pustules on inflamed, red skin, commonly concentrated on the palms or soles, often painful.

Erythrodermic psoriasis

A severe, life-threatening form of psoriasis involving widespread erythema covering more than 90% of the body, often with minimal scaling. It may result in complications such as hypothermia, electrolyte imbalances, and heart failure.

Annular psoriasis

Presents as well-demarcated, erythematous plaques with central clearing, forming a ring-shaped appearance on the skin.

 

Table 2. Summary of psoriasis pathophysiology

Key aspects

Pathophysiological mechanism

Immune dysregulation

Psoriasis is driven by an overactive immune response, involving excessive activation of innate (plasmacytoid dendritic cells, myeloid dendritic cells, neutrophils) and adaptive (Th1, Th17, Tregs) immune pathways, leading to chronic inflammation

IL-23/IL-17 Axis

IL-23, secreted by myeloid dendritic cells, promotes Th17 differentiation. Th17 cells release IL-17A, IL-17F, and IL-22, which stimulate keratinocyte hyperproliferation, chronic inflammation, and epidermal thickening

Keratinocyte dysfunction

IL-17A and IL-22 cause excessive keratinocyte proliferation, impaired differentiation, and increased production of antimicrobial peptides (AMPs), leading to epidermal barrier disruption and persistent immune activation

Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs)

LL37 (cathelicidin), β-defensins, and S100 proteins are overexpressed in psoriatic skin. They form complexes with self-DNA and self-RNA, triggering plasmacytoid dendritic cell activation, leading to IFN-α production and sustained immune stimulation

Cytokine cascade

A self-sustaining inflammatory loop is created by IL-17, IL-23, TNF-α, IFN-γ, and IL-22, which recruit and activate immune cells, maintaining the chronic nature of psoriasis

Angiogenesis & vascular changes

Increased Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) expression promotes angiogenesis, capillary dilation, and endothelial dysfunction, enhancing immune cell infiltration into psoriatic plaques

Genetic susceptibility

Psoriasis has a strong genetic component, with HLA-C*06:02 being the most significant risk factor. Other implicated genes, including IL23R, TNFAIP3, STAT3, TYK2, and LCE3B/C, contribute to immune dysregulation, epidermal barrier dysfunction, and inflammatory signalling

Environmental triggers

Infections, physical trauma (Koebner phenomenon), psychological stress, and medications (β-blockers, NSAIDs, lithium, antimalarials) can activate innate immune responses and worsen disease severity in genetically predisposed individuals

Chronic inflammation

Continuous IL-23/IL-17 axis activation, persistent keratinocyte dysfunction, and ongoing dendritic cell stimulation result in long-term epidermal hyperplasia, immune infiltration, and chronic plaque formation

Targeted therapy

Advances in biologic therapies (IL-17, IL-23, and TNF inhibitors) have revolutionized psoriasis treatment by interrupting inflammatory pathways, reducing immune activation, and improving disease control

 

Table 3. Basic pharmacological treatment

Treatment type

Drug

Mechanism of Action in Psoriasis

Key side effects

Oral systemic therapy

Acitretin (Retinoid)

- Retinoid that regulates gene transcription via nuclear receptors, reducing keratinocyte proliferation

Dry mouth, cheilitis, pruritus, teratogenicity, liver enzyme elevation

Methotrexate (MTX)

- Inhibits dihydrofolate reductase, disrupting DNA synthesis and reducing T-cell proliferation and inflammation

Nausea, mouth ulcers, liver issues

Cyclosporine A (CyA)

- Calcineurin inhibitor that inhibits T-cell activation by blocking cytokine production (e.g., IL-2)

Nephrotoxicity, hepatotoxicity, infection risk

Apremilast

- PDE4 inhibitor that increases cAMP in immune cells, reducing pro-inflammatory cytokine production (e.g., TNFα)

Diarrhea, vomiting, depression

Biologic therapy

Infliximab, Adalimumab, Certolizumab (TNFα Inhibitors)

- Inhibit TNFα, a key inflammatory cytokine involved in the pathogenesis of psoriasis, reducing immune cell activation

Hepatitis reactivation, tuberculosis, lymphoma

Ustekinumab, Guselkumab, Risankizumab, Tildrakizumab (IL23 Inhibitors)

- Target IL-23, a cytokine that plays a critical role in Th17 cell differentiation and inflammatory responses in psoriasis

Nasopharyngitis, respiratory infections

Secukinumab, Ixekizumab, Brodalumab (IL17 Inhibitors)

- Target IL-17, a cytokine that promotes inflammation and keratinocyte activation in psoriasis

Candidiasis, neutropenia, suicidal tendencies (brodalumab)

Novel agents

Tofacitinib, Baricitinib (JAK Inhibitors)

- Inhibit Janus kinases (JAKs), which are involved in cytokine signaling pathways, reducing inflammation in psoriasis

Cholesterol changes, cardiovascular events

Deucravacitinib

- Selective TYK2 (Tyrosine Kinase 2) inhibitor that blocks IL-23, IL-12, and Type I IFN signalling, key cytokine pathways in psoriasis

Upper respiratory infections, acne, mouth ulcers

Ponesimod (S1P Agonist)

- Sphingosine-1 phosphate receptor 1 (S1PR1) agonist that modulates immune cell trafficking to reduce inflammation in psoriasis

Lymphopenia, bradycardia

KD025 (ROCK2 Inhibitor)

- Inhibits Rho-associated kinase 2 (ROCK2), which is involved in cell migration and inflammatory signalling, potentially reducing psoriasis symptoms

Inhibits inflammation and cell migration

 

Table 4. Various types of biomarkers

Category

Biomarker

Role

Genetic biomarkers

PSORS1, HLA-CW6, IL23R, IL12B, IL23A, TNFAIP3

These genes are involved in the susceptibility and severity of psoriasis. They help identify genetic predisposition and guide immune-targeted treatments

Tissue-associated biomarkers

Keratin 16 (K16), CD31, VEGF

These markers are associated with cell proliferation, blood vessel formation, and inflammation in psoriatic lesions, which are valuable for assessing disease activity

Soluble biomarkers

hBD-2, S100A7, S100A8, S100A9, VEGF, LCN2, YKL-40

These markers are elevated in psoriatic skin and fluids, indicating immune system activation and chronic inflammation, helping monitor disease progression and therapeutic response

Biomarkers for comorbidities

GlycA, Psoriasin (S100A7), NT-proBNP, Catalase, LDL antibodies

These biomarkers provide insights into the risk of associated conditions like cardiovascular diseases, oxidative stress, and metabolic disorders in psoriasis patients

Biomarkers for treatment response

C-Reactive Protein (CRP), HLA-C06:02, IL-17

These markers track systemic inflammation and immune responses, aiding in the prediction of treatment outcomes and guiding personalized therapy for psoriasis

Conclusion
The biomarkers discussed provide crucial insights into the pathophysiological mechanisms of psoriasis, encompassing genetic predisposition, immune dysregulation, and environmental factors. A comprehensive understanding of these biomarkers offers substantial promise for advancing personalized medicine. This knowledge allows clinicians to improve diagnostic accuracy, anticipate treatment responses, and effectively monitor disease progression.
However, for these biomarkers to be adopted in routine clinical practice, researchers should validate them through large-scale, multi-center studies and incorporate them into standardized clinical protocols. Validated biomarkers hold the potential to transform psoriasis care by enabling precise, individualized therapeutic strategies that align with disease heterogeneity and patient response variability. By summarizing the mechanistic roles of these biomarkers in psoriasis pathogenesis, this review highlighted their clinical relevance and potential utility in disease monitoring and treatment optimization.

Ethical approval
As this manuscript is a review article based on the previously published data, ethical approval and IRCTID registration are not applicable.

Funding 
None.

Acknowledgement
The authors thank all colleagues and subject experts whose valuable discussions contributed to the refinement of this review. The authors also appreciate the feedback provided by reviewers, which significantly improved the quality of the manuscript.

Conflict of Interest 
The author declares no conflicts of interest.

1. Langley R, Krueger G, Griffiths C. Psoriasis: epidemiology, clinical features, and quality of life. Ann Rheum Dis 2005;64(2):ii18-ii23. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15708928/
2. Mease PJ, Kivitz AJ, Burch FX, Siegel EL, Cohen SB, Ory P, et al. Etanercept treatment of psoriatic arthritis: safety, efficacy, and effect on disease progression. Arthritis Rheum 2004 Jul;50(7):2264-72. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15248226/
3. Mease P, Fleischmann R, Deodhar AA, et al. Effect of certolizumab pegol on signs and symptoms in patients with psoriatic arthritis: 24-week results of a phase 3 double-blind randomised placebo-controlled study (rapid-psa). Ann Rheum Dis 2014;73(1):48-55. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23942868/
4. Dand N, Duckworth M, Baudry D, Russell A, Curtis CJ, Lee SH, et al. HLA-C*06:02 genotype is a predictive biomarker of biologic treatment response in psoriasis. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2019 Jun;143(6):2120-30. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30578879/
5. Masouri S, Stefanaki I, Ntritsos G, Kypreou KP, Drakaki E, Evangelou E, et al. A pharmacogenetic study of psoriasis risk variants in a greek population and prediction of responses to anti-TNF-α and anti-IL-12/23 agents. Mol Diagn Ther 2016 Jun;20(3):221-5. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27043841/
6. Ryan C, Kelleher J, Fagan MF, Rogers S, Collins P, Barker JN, et al. Genetic markers of treatment response to tumour necrosis factor-α inhibitors in the treatment of psoriasis. Clin Exp Dermatol 2014 Jun;39(4):519-24. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24758522/  
7. Gedebjerg A, Johansen C, Kragballe K, Iversen L. IL-20, IL-21 and p40: potential biomarkers of treatment response for ustekinumab. Acta Derm Venereol 2013 Mar 27;93(2):150-5. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22930279/
8. Griffiths CE, Barker JN. Pathogenesis and clinical features of psoriasis. Lancet 2007;370:263–71. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17658397/
9. Jiang S, Hinchliffe TE, Wu T. Biomarkers of an autoimmune skin disease—psoriasis. Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics 2015;13:224–33. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26362816/
10. Michalek IM, Loring B, John SM. A systematic review of worldwide epidemiology of psoriasis. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2017;31:205–12. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27573025/
11. Nestle FO, Kaplan DH, Barker J. Psoriasis. N Engl J Med 2009;361:496–509. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19641206/
12. Villanova F, Di Meglio P, Nestle FO. Biomarkers in psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2013;72:ii104–10. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23532439/
13. Capon F. The genetic basis of psoriasis. Int J Mol Sci 2017;18:2526. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29186830/
14. Krueger JG, Fretzin S, Suárez-Fariñas M, Haslett PA, Phipps KM, Cameron GS, et al. IL-17A is essential for cell activation and inflammatory gene circuits in subjects with psoriasis. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2012;130:145–54. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22677045/
15. Blauvelt A, Chiricozzi A. The immunologic role of IL-17 in psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis pathogenesis. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol 2018;55:379–90. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30109481/
16. Gao Y, Yi X, Ding Y. Combined transcriptomic analysis revealed AKR1B10 played an important role in psoriasis through the dysregulated lipid pathway and overproliferation of keratinocyte. Biomed Res Int 2017:2017:8717369. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29204449/
17. Gudjonsson JE, Ding J, Johnston A, Tejasvi T, Guzman AM, Nair RP, et al. Assessment of the psoriatic transcriptome in a large sample: additional regulated genes and comparisons with in vitro models. J Invest Dermatol 2010 Jul;130(7):1829-40. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20220767/
18. Keermann M, Kõks S, Reimann E, Prans E, Abram K, Kingo K. Transcriptional landscape of psoriasis identifies the involvement of IL36 and IL36RN. BMC Genomics 2015 Apr 19;16(1):322. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25897967/
19. Mitsui H, Suárez-Fariñas M, Belkin DA, Levenkova N, Fuentes-Duculan J, Coats I, et al. Combined use of laser capture microdissection and cDNA microarray analysis identifies locally expressed disease-related genes in focal regions of psoriasis vulgaris skin lesions. J Invest Dermatol 2012;132:1615–26. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22402443/
20. Suárez-Farinas M, Li K, Fuentes-Duculan J, Hayden K, Brodmerkel C, Krueger JG. Expanding the psoriasis disease profile: interrogation of the skin and serum of patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis. J Invest Dermatol 2012;132:2552–64. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22763790/
21. Yao Y, Richman L, Morehouse C, de los Reyes M, Higgs BW, Boutrin A, et al. Type I interferon: potential therapeutic target for psoriasis? PLoS One 2008;3:7. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18648529/
22. Jabbari A, Suárez-Fariñas M, Dewell S, Krueger JG. Transcriptional profiling of psoriasis using RNA-seq reveals previously unidentified differentially expressed genes. J Invest Dermatol 2012;132:246. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21850022/
23. Sevimoglu T, Arga KY. Computational systems biology of psoriasis: are we ready for the age of omics and systems biomarkers? OMICS 2015;19:669–87. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26480058/
24. Sevimoglu T, Turanli B, Bereketoglu C, Arga KY, Karadag AS. Systems biomarkers in psoriasis: integrative evaluation of computational and experimental data at transcript and protein levels. Gene 2018;647:157–63. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29329927/
25. Danielsen K, Olsen AO, Wilsgaard T, Furberg AS. Is the prevalence of psoriasis increasing? A 30-year follow-up of a population-based cohort. Br J Dermatol 2013;168:1303–10. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23374051/
26. Ortonne J, Chimenti S, Luger T, Puig L, Reid F, Trueb RM. Scalp psoriasis: European consensus on grading and treatment algorithm. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2009;23:1435–44. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19614856/
27. Ko HC, Jwa SW, Song M, Kim MB, Kwon KS. Clinical course of guttate psoriasis: Long-term follow-up study. J Dermatol 2010;37:894–9. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20860740/
28. Martin BA, Chalmers RJ, Telfer NR. How great is the risk of further psoriasis following a single episode of acute guttate psoriasis? Arch Dermatol 1996;132:717–18. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8651734/
29. Navarini AA, Burden AD, Capon F, Mrowietz U, Puig L, Koks S, et al. European consensus statement on phenotypes of pustular psoriasis. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2017;31:1792–9. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28585342/
30. Sommer DM, Jenisch S, Suchan M, Christophers E, Weichenthal M. Increased prevalence of the metabolic syndrome in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis. Arch Dermatol Res 2006;298:321–8. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17021763/ 
31. Gerdes S, Mrowietz U, Boehncke WH. [Comorbidity in psoriasis.] Hautarzt 2016;67:438–44. German. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27221798/
32. Ludwig RJ, Herzog C, Rostock A, Ochsendorf FR, Zollner TM, Thaci D, et al. Psoriasis: a possible risk factor for development of coronary artery calcification. Br J Dermatol 2007;156:271–6. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17223866/
33. Gelfand JM, Dommasch ED, Shin DB, Azfar RS, Kurd SK, Wang X, et al. The risk of coronary artery disease in patients with psoriasis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009;53(12):1119–27. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2008.12.058
34. Armstrong AW, Read C. Pathophysiology, clinical presentation, and treatment of psoriasis. JAMA 2020;323(19):1945–60. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32427307/
35. Sarbu MI, Mitran MI, Mitran CI, Mitran CI, Matei C, Georgescu SR. The pathophysiological mechanisms and the quest for biomarkers in psoriasis, a stress-related skin disease. Dis Markers 2018;2018:5823684. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29619128/
36. Honma M, Nozaki H. Molecular pathogenesis of psoriasis and biomarkers reflecting disease activity. J Clin Med 2021;10:3199. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34361983/
37. Benoit S, Toksoy A, Ahlmann M, Schmidt M, Sunderkötter C, Foell D, et al. Elevated serum levels of calcium-binding S100 proteins A8 and A9 reflect disease activity and abnormal differentiation of keratinocytes in psoriasis. Br J Dermatol 2006;155:62–6. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16792753/
38. Takahashi T, Yamasaki K. Psoriasis and antimicrobial peptides. Int J Mol Sci 2020;21:6791. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32947991/
39. Mellor LF, Gago-Lopez N, Bakiri L, Schmidt FN, Busse B, Rauber S, et al. Keratinocyte-derived S100A9 modulates neutrophil infiltration and affects psoriasis-like skin and joint disease. Ann Rheum Dis 2022;81:1400–8. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35788494/
40. Luengas-Martinez A, Hardman-Smart J, Paus R, Young HS. Vascular endothelial growth factor-A as a promising therapeutic target for the management of psoriasis. Exp Dermatol 2020;29:687–98. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32654325/
41. Wang D, Fang L, Pan G. Association of serum lipocalin-2 concentrations with psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis: An updated meta-analysis. Dis Markers 2019;2019:7361826. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31467617/
42. Shao S, Cao T, Jin L, Li B, Fang H, Zhang J, et al. Increased lipocalin-2 contributes to the pathogenesis of psoriasis by modulating neutrophil chemotaxis and cytokine secretion. J Invest Dermatol 2016;136:1418–28. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26979478/
43. Pourani MR, Abdollahimajd F, Zargari O, Shahidi Dadras M. Soluble biomarkers for diagnosis, monitoring, and therapeutic response assessment in psoriasis. J Dermatolog Treat 2022;33:1967–74. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34369253/
44. Kong Y, Zhang S, Su X, Peng D, Su Y. Serum levels of YKL-40 are increased in patients with psoriasis: A meta-analysis. Postgrad Med 2019;131:405–12. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31298974/
45. Baliwag J, Barnes DH, Johnston A. Cytokines in psoriasis. Cytokine 2015;73:342–50. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25585875/
46. Smith RL, Hébert HL, Massey J, Bowes J, Marzo-Ortega H, Ho P, et al. Association of toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) with chronic plaque type psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. Arch Dermatol Res 2016;308:201–5. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26830904/
47. Barbi W, Kumar S, Sinha S, Askari M, Priya S, Kumar SJ. Reliability of C-reactive protein as a biomarker for cardiovascular and oral diseases in young and old subjects. J Pharm Bioallied Sci 2021;13 Suppl 2:S1458–61. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35018009/
48. Otvos JD, Shalaurova I, Wolak-Dinsmore J, Connelly MA, Mackey RH, Stein JH, et al. GlycA: A composite nuclear magnetic resonance biomarker of systemic inflammation. Clin Chem 2015;61:714–23. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25779987/
49. Xia C, Braunstein Z, Toomey AC, Zhong J, Rao X. S100 proteins as an important regulator of macrophage inflammation. Front Immunol 2018;8:1908. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29379499/
50. Vegfors J, Ekman AK, Stoll SW, Bivik Eding C, Enerbäck C. Psoriasin (S100A7) promotes stress-induced angiogenesis. Br J Dermatol 2016;175:1263–73. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27155199/
51. Awad SM, Attallah DA, Salama RH, Mahran AM, Abu El-Hamed E. Serum levels of psoriasin (S100A7) and koebnerisin (S100A15) as potential markers of atherosclerosis in patients with psoriasis. Clin Exp Dermatol 2018;43:262–7. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29333662/
52. Hammer Q, Rückert T, Dunst J, Romagnani C. Adaptive natural killer cells integrate interleukin-18 during target-cell encounter. Front Immunol 2018;8:1976. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29387058/
53. Arican O, Aral M, Sasmaz S, Ciragil P. Serum levels of TNF-alpha, IFN-gamma, IL-6, IL-8, IL-12, IL-17, and IL-18 in patients with active psoriasis and correlation with disease severity. Mediators Inflamm 2005;2005:273–9. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16258194/
54. Forouzandeh M, Besen J, Keane RW, de Rivero Vaccari JP. The inflammasome signaling proteins ASC and IL-18 as biomarkers of psoriasis. Front Pharmacol 2020;11:1238. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32903782/
55. Pietrzak A, Bartosinska J, Blaszczyk R, Chodorowska G, Brzozowski W, Hercogova J, et al. Increased serum level of N-terminal Pro-B-type natriuretic peptide as a possible biomarker of cardiovascular risk in psoriatic patients. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2015;29:1010–4. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24735175/
56. Peluso R, Caso F, Tasso M, Sabbatino V, Lupoli R, Dario Di Minno MN, et al. Biomarkers of subclinical atherosclerosis in patients with psoriatic arthritis. Open Access Rheumatol 2019;11:143–56. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31388317/
57. Abdollahimajd F, Niknezhad N, Haghighatkhah HR, Namazi N, Niknejad N, Talebi A. Angiotensin-converting enzyme and subclinical atherosclerosis in psoriasis: is there any association? A case-control study. J Am Acad Dermatol 2020;82:980–1.e1. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30114455/
58. Rodríguez-Cerdeira C, Cordeiro-Rodríguez M, Carnero Gregorio M, López-Barcenas A, Martínez-Herrera E, Fabbrocini G, et al. Biomarkers of inflammation in obesity-psoriatic patients. Mediators Inflamm 2019;2019:7353420. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31275060/
59. Dobrică EC, Cozma MA, Găman MA, Voiculescu VM, Găman AM. The involvement of oxidative stress in psoriasis: a systematic review. Antioxidants (Basel) 2022;11:282. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35204165/
60. Hwang J, Yoo JA, Yoon H, Han T, Yoon J, An S, et al. The role of leptin in the association between obesity and psoriasis. Biomol Ther (Seoul) 2021;29:11–21. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32690821/
61. Huang H, Shen E, Tang S, Tan X, Guo X, Wang Q, et al. Increased serum resistin levels correlate with psoriasis: a meta-analysis. Lipids Health Dis 2015;14:44. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25980409/
62. Seth D, Ehlert AN, Golden JB, Damiani G, McCormick TS, Cameron MJ, et al. Interaction of resistin and systolic blood pressure in psoriasis severity. J Invest Dermatol 2020;140:1279–82.e1. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31734188/
63. Bavoso NC, Pinto JM, Soares MMS, Diniz MDS, Teixeira Júnior AL. Psoriasis in obesity: comparison of serum levels of leptin and adiponectin in obese subjects-cases and controls. An Bras Dermatol 2019;94:192–7. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31090824/
64. Al-Harbi NO, Nadeem A, Ansari MA, Al-Harbi MM, Alotaibi MR, AlSaad AM, et al. Psoriasis-like inflammation leads to renal dysfunction via upregulation of NADPH oxidases and inducible nitric oxide synthase. Int Immunopharmacol 2017;46:1–8. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28249219/ 
65. Nicolae I, Tampa M, Ene CD, Mitran CI, Mitran MI, Sarbu MI, et al. Correlations between related-purine derivatives and renal disorders in patients with psoriasis vulgaris. Exp Ther Med 2019;17:1012–9. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30679967/
66. Dai H, Adamopoulos IE. Psoriatic arthritis under the influence of IFN?. Clin Immunol 2020;218:108513. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32574710/
67. Silvagni E, Missiroli S, Perrone M, Patergnani S, Boncompagni C, Bortoluzzi A, et al. From bed to bench and back: TNF-α, IL-23/IL-17A, and JAK-dependent inflammation in the pathogenesis of psoriatic synovitis. Front Pharmacol 2021;12:672515. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34211394/
68. Cretu D, Gao L, Liang K, Soosaipillai A, Diamandis EP, Chandran V. Differentiating psoriatic arthritis from psoriasis without arthritis using serum biomarkers. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2018 Mar;70(3):454-61. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28586166/
69. Uygur S, Demirel S, Aksu G, Baysal O, Narin A. Leptin and resistin levels in psoriasis: The relationship with psoriasis severity. Clin Biochem 2013;46:1771–5.
70. Hacimustafaoglu M, Karabudak O, Kadir T, Yenigün V, Korkmaz C. Serum interleukin-6, interleukin-10, and C-reactive protein levels in psoriasis: Correlation with disease activity. Dermatology 2012;225:263–8.
71. Saini N, Mistry J, Singh A, Gaikwad P. The role of miRNAs as psoriasis biomarkers: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Biol Chem 2021;402:537–47. doi:10.1515/hsz-2021-0221.
72. Duan Z, Zhang C, Shi X, Wang C, Zhao Q, Liu J, et al. The clinical application of psoriasis biomarkers: Insights from the most recent studies. J Transl Med 2022;20:76. doi:10.1186/s12967-022-03287-9.
73. Villanueva-Rodríguez G, Sánchez-Muñoz F, González-González N. TLR3, TLR4, and TLR7 in the pathogenesis of psoriasis. Exp Dermatol 2018;27:741–7.
74. Javanbakht M, Asgarian-Omran H, Emamifar A, Baghery M. The role of interleukin-17 and interleukin-22 in the pathogenesis of psoriasis: Their potential as biomarkers. Dermatol Ther 2021;34:e14981. doi:10.1111/dth.14981.