Journal of Iranian Medical Council

Journal of Iranian Medical Council

Comprehensive Study on Patients with Molar Pregnancy Referred to Mahdieh Hospital in Tehran: A Descriptive and Retrospective Research

Document Type : Original article

Authors
1 Student Research Committee, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2 Prevention Gynecology Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
3 Clinical Research Development Center, Mahdiyeh Educational Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Abstract
Background: Hydatidiform mole is a rare but clinically significant pregnancy abnormality. This study was undertaken to improve understanding of molar pregnancy risk factors in the Iranian population and to develop strategies for early detection and management. It also aimed to evaluate the impact of Methotrexate (MTX) chemoprophylaxis on progression to Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia (GTN).
Methods: This single-center, retrospective descriptive study was conducted at Mahdieh Hospital in Tehran between 2011 and 2023. A total of 449 patients with histopathologically confirmed molar pregnancies were included. Detailed clinical and laboratory data were collected and analyzed using SPSS (version 26), with significance set at p<0.05. GTN was diagnosed according to FIGO criteria, based on serial β-hCG monitoring (rising or plateauing levels) and confirmed by histopathological examination.
Results: The incidence was 6.75 per 1,000 pregnancies. Anemia and vaginal bleeding were the most common presenting symptoms. Complete moles accounted for 66.6% of cases. Among 18 patients who received MTX prophylaxis, elevated β-hCG levels and larger uterine size were significantly associated with MTX administration (p<0.001). However, MTX prophylaxis did not significantly prevent progression to GTN (p=0.365). During follow-up, 11 patients developed GTN.
Conclusion: Molar pregnancies in Iran exhibited a higher incidence compared to developed countries. The limited benefit of prophylactic MTX in this small subgroup support the need for larger, multicenter studies to refine treatment protocols.

Keywords

Introduction
Gestational Trophoblastic Disease (GTD) includes conditions ranging from benign Hydatidiform Mole (HM) to malignant Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia (GTN) (1). Molar pregnancies are categorized as complete or partial, both of which can progress to malignancies like choriocarcinoma, invasive mole, Placental Site Trophoblastic Tumor (PSTT), and Epithelioid Trophoblastic Tumor (ETT) (2). Post-molar GTN (PGTN) refers to neoplastic development after a molar pregnancy, with incidence influenced by factors such as maternal age and β-hCG levels (3-5). HM is characterized by abnormal trophoblastic growth and swollen placental villi, making it a rare yet clinically significant condition (6).
The global incidence of HM varies significantly, with rates in Europe and North America ranging from 0.6 to 1.2 per 1,000 pregnancies (7). Worldwide estimates suggest a higher rate of 3.3 per 1,000, likely due to better diagnostic tools and increased recognition of partial moles. Regions like Southeast Asia report even higher frequencies, possibly influenced by genetic factors, environmental conditions, and disparities in healthcare access and practices (8).
Advanced diagnostic tools like ultrasonography and β-hCG assays have significantly improved early detection of molar pregnancies, altering their clinical presentation (5). However, management remains challenging due to delayed consultations and vague symptoms. Research in Iran has provided important data on prevalence and characteristics, aiding the development of better healthcare strategies (9,10).
Several risk factors increase the likelihood of HM, including maternal age under 20 or over 35 years, infertility (especially after ovulation induction), spontaneous abortion, prior molar pregnancy, multiparity, blood group A, vitamin A deficiency, and smoking (7,9). Recognizing these factors is vital for early detection and prevention, particularly in Iranian women. In the Almasi et al study, 61 HM cases were found among 8,614 pregnancies (7 per 1,000). Women with HM were significantly more likely to have prior molar pregnancies, spontaneous abortions, lifetime oral contraceptive use, and ovulation induction history (11).
High-risk molar pregnancies typically stemming from complete moles are a major precursor to GTN. They are characterized by elevated β-hCG levels, large theca lutein cysts, advanced maternal age, and an enlarged uterus relative to gestational age. GTN is diagnosed using International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO)/the World Health Organization (WHO) criteria, which include rising or plateauing β-hCG levels post-evacuation, persistent β-hCG elevation, histological confirmation of choriocarcinoma and/or radiologic evidence of metastases (12).
Some reports indicate that a single-dose prophylactic Methotrexate (MTX) regimen may lower the risk of GTN after suction evacuation; however, major guidelines [FIGO, European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO)] do not recommend routine prophylactic chemotherapy except when reliable follow-up cannot be ensured (13,14). A randomized clinical trial in India found that a 100 mg intramuscular MTX dose significantly shortened β-hCG normalization time (15). Similarly, Aminimoghaddam et al reported reduced incidence of GTN in Iranian patients with high-risk features who received prophylactic MTX (16). However, more recent researches in 2021–22 from a Tehran hospital (22 patients receive single dose MTX vs. 58 controls) showed no significant benefit of MTX in remission rates, β-hCG normalization, or prevention of postmolar GTN, suggesting ongoing controversy regarding its effectiveness (17).
Further research is essential to clarify risk factors and improve early detection and management of molar pregnancies in Iran. This retrospective descriptive study, conducted at Mahdieh Hospital in Tehran during 2011–23, aimed to:
1. Assess the incidence and related sociodemographic and clinical risk factors, 2. Detail the main clinical presentations and outcomes, and 3. Evaluate the role of prophylactic MTX in preventing progression to GTN.

Materials and Methods
Study design and ethical consideration
This retrospective descriptive study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences (Approval No. IR.SBMU.RETECH.REC.1402.718) and conducted at a tertiary care hospital in Tehran. For participants who attended clinic visits during the study period or were contacted by telephone to complete missing data, verbal informed consent was obtained prior to data collection. For cases identified solely through our existing clinical database—into which patients are informed upon admission that their de-identified data may be used for research—the IRB granted a waiver of informed consent. All records were fully anonymized before analysis, and no personal identifiers were retained.

Eligibility and data collection
Women with pathologically confirmed molar pregnancies diagnosed within the defined study period were included. Histopathologic confirmation of molar pregnancy was performed according to the World Health Organization (WHO) classification criteria for GTD (14), including evaluation of villous size, trophoblastic proliferation, and stromal characteristics. All ultrasound examinations were conducted and interpreted following the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) guidelines (12), assessing features such as cystic villi and myometrial invasion. Records were included if they met the following criteria: no early pregnancy bleeding from other causes (such as ectopic pregnancy or incomplete miscarriage) and to have a definitive diagnosis of molar pregnancy. Computerized and paper-based Data were collected on sociodemographic history (age, parity, gestational age) and post pregnancy outcomes, including any previous molar pregnancies. Details on presenting complaints and physical examination findings were recorded. Investigations included blood tests, blood grouping, thyroid profile, serum β-hCG levels, and chest radiography. The uterine evacuation procedure and follow-up protocol- including histopathology reports and serial β-hCG monitoring- were documented. 
Whenever the patient’s medical information was incomplete, the data would be completed by calling and asking the patients. Diagnosis of GTN were tailored according to FIGO guidelines, including serum β-hCG trends, histopathology, and imaging findings.

Prophylactic MTX protocol
Adult patients were considered high-risk for PGTN if they met one or more of the following before uterine evacuation:  
- Serum β-hCG > 100,000 mIU/mL.  
- Maternal age > 40 years.  
- Uterine size greater than expected for gestational age.  
- Theca lutein ovarian cysts > 6 cm.  
- Predicted poor adherence to follow-up (it is a condition for all the patients received MTX prophylaxis).  
High risk patients who required or opted for hysterectomy were excluded from prophylaxis protocol. Patients who had received prophylactic MTX were administered the drug intramuscularly at a dose of 50 mg/m² as a single injection, given 6-12 hrs before evacuation or within 24 hours afterward for those who required or opted for suction evacuation.
Follow-up monitoring included: 1. Weekly serum β-hCG measurements until three consecutive values fell below 5 mIU/mL; 2. Monthly β-hCG assessments for 6 months thereafter; 3. Transvaginal ultrasound, complete blood count, liver and renal function tests if β-hCG levels plateaued or rose on two consecutive measurements.

Statistical analysis
Data were analyzed using SPSS software (IBM SPSS Statistics, version 26.0). For descriptive statistics, frequencies and percentages were used for categorical variables, and means±standard deviations (SD) or medians [interquartile range, IQR] were used for continuous variables, as appropriate. For categorical variable comparisons, the chi-squared test was applied. Continuous variables were analyzed using the independent t-test or Mann–Whitney U test, depending on data distribution. Statistical significance was set at p<0.05. All analyses included sociodemographic characteristics, gestational age, clinical history, presenting complaints, findings from physical examinations and investigations, management procedures, histopathology reports, and follow-up outcomes. The effect of prophylactic MTX on progression to GTN was assessed by comparing two patient cohorts. 

Results
Descriptive characteristics of the studied population
A total of 449 molar pregnancy cases were identified at Mahdieh Hospital between March 2011 and June 2023. All 449 patients had at least one month of follow-up documented in the hospital’s electronic health record. No patient was lost to follow-up; all 449 had complete outcome data. Of these, 89 patients (19.8 %) did not return for scheduled in-person follow-up beyond their initial visit. For those 89 patients, we conducted telephone interviews to ascertain clinical status and β-hCG results. While we could not verify the regularity of their assessments at external facilities, all reported laboratory confirmation of β-hCG normalization (<5 mIU/mL) or persistent were recruited (in these cases, they visit other hospitals). These cases represent a hospital-based frequency of approximately 6.75 per 1,000 pregnancies during the study period (2-13.7 per 1,000 cases of molar pregnancy annually). It is important to note that, since these cases were referred from various settings, this figure does not represent the true incidence of molar pregnancies in the general population, but rather the frequency observed among patients managed at our tertiary care center. Figure 1 showed the annual trend of molar pregnancies between March 2011 and June 2023.
Table 1 showed the summary of descriptive information for the studied population. The mean maternal age at diagnosis was 29.43 years (range, 14-55), and nearly half of the patients were aged 20-30 years. The majority (80.7%) were Iranian. A total of 109 patients (24.3%) had comorbidities, with hypothyroidism, heart disease and hypertension, diabetes, asthma, and depression being the most common. None of the patients had a history of alcohol consumption, and only three patients (0.7%) were smokers. A history of OCP use during their lifetime was reported by 148 patients (32.7%). The most common blood groups were A positive (31.3%) and O positive (31.1%). Seventeen patients had one previous molar pregnancy, and three had two previous molar pregnancies. A larger uterine size than dates was observed in 81.2%, equal size in 11.1%, and smaller size in 7.7% of patients. 

Table 1. Descriptive information of the studied population

Variable

Summary measures (N=449)

Age

29.43±7.03

<20 years

51(11.3%)

20-30 years

212(47.3%)

30-40 years

158(35.1%)

40-50 years

26(5.8%)

Older than 50 years

2(0.4%)

Comorbidity

 

No

340(75.6%)

Yes

109(24.4%)

Hypothyroidism

28(6.2%)

Cardiac disease and HTN

16(3.2%)

GDM and DM

12(2.6%)

Asthma

3(0.7%)

Depression

3(0.7%)

Nationality

 

Iranian

362(80.7%)

Afghan

86(19.1%)

Pakistani

1(0.2%)

Smoking

 

No

446(99.3%)

Yes

3(0.7%)

OCP use

 

No

301(67.3%)

Yes

148(32.7%)

Blood group

 

A+

141(31.3%)

B+

100(22.2%)

AB+

29(6.4%)

O+

139(31.1%)

A-

10(2.2%)

B-

17(3.8%)

AB-

2(0.4%)

O-

11(2.4%)

History of previous molar pregnancy

 

No

429(95.6%)

Yes

20(4.4%)

Gravidity

2.52(median: 2; range:1-10)

Parity

1.16(median: 1; range: 0-8)

Living children

1.11(median: 1; range: 0-8)

Abortion

0.3(median: 0; range: 0-4)

Age of gestation in weeks at diagnosis

8.42±2.4 (range: 4-20)

Age of gestation in weeks at treatment

10.49±3.16 (range: 4-20)

Uterine size in weeks at diagnosis

10.35±2.78 (range: 6-24)

Serum β-hCG level at diagnosis

99,899.83 [median (IQR)]: 24,941.5 [4,995-141,784]) mIU/ml

Time to reach a normal serum β-hCG level

84.45(median [IQR]: 51 [36-101]) days

Follow-up*

6.18±3.6 years

Subsequent pregnancy

 

No

288(64.2%)

Yes

164(35.8%)

One subsequent pregnancy

109(24.2%)

Two subsequent pregnancies

46(10.2%)

Three subsequent pregnancies

6(1.3%)

Time from molar pregnancy to first subsequent pregnancy

2.01±1.58 (range: 0-8) years

Time from molar pregnancy to second subsequent pregnancy

5.15±2.18 (range: 2-12) years

Time from molar pregnancy to third subsequent pregnancy*

7.83±1.47 (range: 6-10) years

Result of first subsequent pregnancy

87 children (79.9%), 12 abortions (11%),

10 molar pregnancies (9.1%)

Result of second subsequent pregnancy

42 children (91.3%), 2 abortions (4.3%),

 2 molar pregnancies (4.3%)

Result of third subsequent pregnancy

5 children (71.4%),1 abortion (14.3%),

1 molar pregnancy (14.3%)

* Measures provided as mean±SD, † Measures provided as number (percentage), ‡ Measures provided as mean (median or [IQR]).

 

Clinical features
As shown in table 2, One hundred ninety-five patients (43.8%) had anemia at diagnosis, but none required blood transfusion. Vaginal bleeding was the second most common manifestation at diagnosis (n=149). Four patients (0.8%) developed thyrotoxicosis, although no thyroid storm occurred. Four patients (0.8%) fulfilled the criteria for HELLP syndrome. On transvaginal ultrasound, theca lutein cysts were observed in only two patients (0.4%), and none required interventional surgery for this complication.
A variety of complications were documented among patients after GTD treatment. These included both complications that may be related to treatment and other health issues that developed during follow‑up after surgery. For transparency, table 3 presents all complications observed in this cohort, without restricting them solely to treatment‑related adverse effects. The most common complications after treatment were re-surgery (5.1%), hemorrhage (2.2%), nausea and vomiting (0.9), surgical site infection (0.7 %), headache (0.7%), and hypertension (0.7%) (Table 3). One patient suffered severe anemia due to massive hemorrhage and therefore received two units of packed red blood cells.
The majority of patients (N=337, 65.6%) had histopathology confirming Complete Hydatidiform Mole (CHM). Partial Hydatidiform Mole (PHM) was seen in 112 patients (24.9%), while 43 reports (9.5%) did not specify the HM subtype.
CXR was performed for all patients before treatment. One patient’s CXR showed evidence of lung metastasis. Metastatic disease was also identified on brain CT in one patient, who was referred to an oncologist for treatment.

Treatment and follow-up 
Suction curettage was the main treatment method, used alone in 92.2% of cases and with MTX chemoprophylaxis in 4%. Hysterectomy with or without salpingo-oophorectomy for moles in situ was performed in 1.1% of patients. Twelve patients (2.7%) sought treatment at other centers; no detailed information was available regarding the type of treatment they received.
Eighteen patients (4%) received prophylactic MTX prior to definitive surgical management. At our institution, definitive management consisted of suction curettage to evacuate molar tissue. These high-risk cases those who met the criteria described in the methods section, including advanced maternal age, markedly elevated β‑hCG levels, excessive uterine enlargement, theca lutein cysts larger than 6 cm, or a history of prior molar pregnancy. Table 4 presents all comparisons—baseline β-hCG, uterine enlargement above gestational age, time to β-hCG normalization, and post-molar neoplasia with corresponding medians (IQRs), counts (percentages), and p-values between patients who did not receive MTX and those who did receive MTX.
During follow-up of the 449 patients, 11 (2.4%) developed PGTN. Among these, eight presented with invasive mole, two with choriocarcinoma, and one with PSTT. Of the 11 patients who developed GTN, one had received chemoprophylaxis with MTX prior to definitive surgical management, while the remaining 10 underwent definitive surgical management alone. All GTN cases were stratified using the FIGO risk scoring system and were classified as low risk, with scores ranging from 2 to 6.
Most patients were followed for at least one month after treatment. The mean follow-up duration was 6.18 years (range, 0-12 years). Six patients were excluded from the contraceptive-method follow-up because they had undergone hysterectomy and did not require contraception. Of the remaining patients, 22.3% did not use any contraceptive method; 53.9% used withdrawal; 11.5% used hormonal contraception; 9.3% used condoms; and 3.0% used an Intrauterine Device (IUD). A total of 164 patients conceived again after treatment of molar pregnancy; details are provided in table 1. A 49-year-old patient, gravida 6, para 1 (term), abortion 1, with one living child and four molar pregnancies experienced three consecutive post-molar pregnancies, all of which resulted in molar gestations.

 

Table 2. Clinical presentation and diagnostic findings at the time of diagnosis

Symptom

Number

Anemia

195

Vaginal bleeding

149

Abortion (missed or incomplete)

14

Abdominal pain

14

Nausea and vomiting

6

Thyrotoxicosis

4

Dyspnea

1

Mense retardation

21

Molar pregnancy sonography

124

Blighted ovum sonography

86

FHR negative sonography

66

Elevated β-hCG

6

Patients may have one or more.

 

Table 3. Complications observed among patients after GTD treatment

Complication

Number

Re-surgery

23

Hemorrhage

10

Nausea and vomiting

4

Surgical site infection

3

Headache

3

Hypertension

3

Back pain

2

Infertility

2

Urine incontinency

2

Relapse

2

Recurrent abortion

1

Tachycardia

1

Hypotension

1

Hernia

1

Patients may have one or more.

 

Table 4. Comparative outcomes by chemoprophylaxis status

Variable

Prophylaxis

(n=18)

No prophylaxis

(n=421)

p-value

Baseline serum β-hCG (mIU/mL), median (IQR)

223,361

[146,776-397,160]

22,410

[4,436.5-107,049.5]

p<0.001

Uterine enlargement above gestational

age (cm), median (IQR)

15[12-18]

10[8-12]

p<0.001

Time to β-hCG normalization (days), median (IQR); n

77[44–141]

48[33–98]

0.180

Post-molar neoplasia, n(%)

1(0.22%)

10(2.27%)

0.365

 

Discussion
This study evaluated 449 confirmed molar pregnancy cases over a 12-year period at a tertiary center in Tehran, finding an incidence of 6.75 per 1,000 pregnancies. The majority of patients were young. Most presented with anemia and vaginal bleeding. Complete hydatidiform moles accounted for 66.6% of cases. Notably, 18 high-risk patients received prophylactic MTX based on elevated β-hCG levels and larger-than-expected uterine size. However, no significant reduction in progression to GTN was observed compared to the standard management group (p=0.365). 
Based on the present study, the mean maternal age was 29.43 years, reflecting a young patient population. This finding aligns with a retrospective cross-sectional study in the Philippines, which reported a mean age of 29 years among molar pregnancy cases (18). Similarly, studies from Asia, Europe, and North America found that most patients with molar pregnancy were aged 20-30 years (19-22). The higher fertility rate in this age group may account for the increased incidence of molar pregnancy observed (23).
Incidence rates of molar pregnancy vary globally, with our study reporting 6.75 per 1,000 pregnancies comparable to rates in Iran (7 per 1,000) (11) and Pakistan (5.1 per 1,000) (20). Other Asian and African countries show wide variation, such as Japan (2.02 per 1,000 live births), Malaysia (2.6 per 1,000 pregnancies), Egypt (13.1 per 1,000 pregnancies), and Turkey (7 per 1,000 pregnancies) (22,24-26), while lower rates are noted in the USA and parts of Europe (27,28). These disparities may stem from nutritional deficiencies like folate and vitamin A (29), but comparisons should be cautious due to differences in study design, population type (community vs. hospital-based) (20), center scale (18,24,25), methodology (retrospective vs. prospective) (25,27), and diagnostic criteria (20,30,31). Tertiary centers, including the present study, often capture more severe cases (20,24), whereas registry-based studies offer broader population insights (22,28).
Vaginal bleeding was the most common presenting symptom in molar pregnancy, followed by abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, and delayed menses consistent with findings from other population-based studies (32,33). Over 40% of patients were anemic at diagnosis, though only one required transfusion for severe anemia, contrasting with earlier reports of higher transfusion rates (34).
Uterine enlargement beyond gestational age was observed in approximately 81% of cases in our study, consistent with previous reports of frequent overgrowth in molar pregnancies (34,35). In contrast, fewer than 10% of patients with partial moles in a European cohort exhibited this feature (36).
This study assessed whether single-dose prophylactic MTX could reduce the risk of PGTN. Although early trials suggested potential benefit, major guidelines (FIGO, RCOG) advise against routine prophylaxis unless follow-up is unreliable (14). MTX was given to patients with larger uterine size and elevated β-hCG, but no significant reduction in GTN incidence was observed (p=0.365), possibly due to small sample size and selection bias. A trend toward faster β-hCG remission was noted, indicating possible clinical relevance in high-risk cases. These findings contrast with earlier studies showing protective effects (16,31,37,38), though differences in methodology, sample size, and use of folinic acid may explain the discrepancy. Notably, a recent Iranian study in 2024 also found single-dose MTX ineffective as a prophylactic strategy (17). Beyond regional data, randomized trials and systematic reviews have shown mixed results regarding prophylactic MTX for GTN. One meta-analysis found MTX had fewer toxicities in low-risk patients but was less effective than actinomycin-D (39). A multicenter trial confirmed MTX’s tolerability but noted limited efficacy (40), while another review suggested MTX-based protocols may benefit high-risk patients (41). Overall, the effectiveness of prophylactic MTX appears to depend on methodological factors such as sample size, patient selection, and treatment regimen.
This study benefits from a relatively large cohort and extended follow-up, enhancing the reliability of its findings. As this was a retrospective, single-center study, there is potential for selection and recall bias, particularly in cases where data were supplemented by phone interviews. Conducted at a single tertiary referral center with 449 cases remains modest, the results may not be widely generalizable. Additionally, the inclusion of ethnically diverse participants, not limited to Iranians, may have influenced outcomes.

Conclusion
In summary, this study revealed a notably high incidence of molar pregnancies in Iran and underscored variability in clinical presentation, with vaginal bleeding being the most prevalent symptom. Although MTX prophylaxis was administered to high-risk patients, we did not observe a significant reduction in GTN incidence, which may be influenced by the relatively small number of patients receiving prophylaxis. From a policy perspective, the development of regional guidelines for molar pregnancy management and investment in patient education programs could enhance adherence to surveillance protocols and ultimately reduce progression to GTN. These findings support the need for further research to optimize diagnostic and management protocols tailored to regional practices.

Acknowledgement
This study, approved by the technical and ethical review board with ethics code: IR.SBMU.RETECH.REC.1402.718.

Conflict of Interest
There was no conflict of interest in this manuscript.

1. Rachdi H, Mokrani A, Batti R, Raies H, Touhami O, Ayadi M, et al. Gestational trophoblastic neoplasia: A Tunisian multicenter study. Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Care 2019;4(2):59-64.
2. Hurteau JA. Gestational trophoblastic disease: management of hydatidiform mole. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2003;46(3):557-69. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12972737/
3. Braga A, Mora P, de Melo AC, Nogueira-Rodrigues A, Amim-Junior J, Rezende-Filho J, et al. Challenges in the diagnosis and treatment of gestational trophoblastic neoplasia worldwide. World J Clin Oncol 2019;10(2):28. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30815369/
4. Mittal S, Menon S. Interstitial pregnancy mimicking an invasive hydatidiform mole. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2019;220(5):501. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31079718/
5. Shaaban AM, Rezvani M, Haroun RR, Kennedy AM, Elsayes KM, Olpin JD, et al. Gestational trophoblastic disease: clinical and imaging features. Radiographics 2017;37(2):681-700. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28287945/
6. Ocheke AN, Musa J, Uamai AO. Hydatidiform mole in Jos, Nigeria. Niger Med J 2011;52(4):223-6. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22529502/
7. Ghassemzadeh S, Farci F, Kang M. Hydatidiform Mole.[Updated 2023 May 22]. StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing. 2022.
8. Colgan TJ, Chang MC, Nanji S, Kolomietz E. A reappraisal of the incidence of placental hydatidiform mole using selective molecular genotyping. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2016;26(7):1345-50. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27258730/
9. Alimohammadi N, Pakniat H, Mirzadeh MS, Emami A, Farahani AV. Molar pregnancy and its associated risk factors: A case-control study in qazvin, iran. Journal of Advanced Biomedical Sciences 2022 Feb 11.
10. Nankali A, Zakeri S, Pourmand D, Zamanfar K. Comparison of clinical presentation of complete molar pregnancy and partial molar pregnancy in Imam Reza teaching hospital 2006-2018.
11. Almasi A, Almassinokiani F, Akbari P. Frequency of molar pregnancies in health care centers of Tehran, Iran. J Reprod Infertil 2014;15(3):157. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25202674/
12. Horowitz N, Eskander R, Adelman M, Burke W. Epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment of gestational trophoblastic disease: A Society of Gynecologic Oncology evidenced-based review and recommendation. Gynecol Oncol 2021;163(3):605-13. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34686354/
13. Ngan H, Bender H, Benedet J, Jones H, Montruccoli G, Pecorelli S, et al. Gestational trophoblastic neoplasia, FIGO 2000 staging and classification. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2003;83:175-7. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14763174/
14. Ngan HY, Seckl MJ, Berkowitz RS, Xiang Y, Golfier F, Sekharan PK, et al. Diagnosis and management of gestational trophoblastic disease: 2021 update. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2021;155:86-93. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34669197/
15. Biswas J, Dasgupta S, Datta M, Datta M, Saha S, Pradhan P. Effect of single-dose methotrexate injection to prevent neoplastic changes in high risk complete hydatidiform mole: A randomised control trial. J Family Med Prim Care 2022;11(10):6036-41. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36618146/
16. Aminimoghaddam S, Mahmoudzadeh F, Mohammadi M. Prophylactic chemotherapy with methotrexate leucovorin in high-risk hydatidiform mole. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2020;21(6):1755. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32592374/
17. Akhavan S, Hoorshad N, Mousavi As, Sheikhhasani S, Rezayof E, Zamani N. The role of single-dose prophylactic methotrexate in the prevention of post-molar gestational trophoblastic neoplasia in patients with high-risk molar pregnancy. BMC Cancer 2024;24(1):1400. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39538177/
18. Cañete-Villariasa SJL, Soriano-Estrella AL. A five-year review of the clinicopathologic profile of patients with hydatidiform mole at the Philippine General Hospital.
19. Drake RD, Rao GG, McIntire DD, Miller DS, Schorge JO. Gestational trophoblastic disease among Hispanic women: a 21-year hospital-based study. Gynecol Oncol 2006;103(1):81-6. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16516953/
20. Fatima M, Kasi PM, Baloch SN, Kassi M, Marri SM, Kassi M. Incidence, management, and outcome of molar pregnancies at a tertiary care hospital in quetta, pakistan. International Scholarly Research Notices 2011;2011(1):925316.
21. Lund H, Vyberg M, Eriksen HH, Grove A, Jensen AØ, Sunde L. hydatidiform mole: validity of the registration in the Danish national Patient registry, the Danish Cancer registry, and the Danish Pathology registry 1999–2009. Clin Epidemiol 2018:1223-31. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30271218/
22. Yamamoto E, Nishino K, Niimi K, Ino K. Epidemiologic study on gestational trophoblastic diseases in Japan. J Gynecol Oncol 2022;33(6):e72. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36047375/
23. García D, Brazal S, Rodríguez A, Prat A, Vassena R. Knowledge of age-related fertility decline in women: A systematic review. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol
24. Nirmala C, Nor Azlin M, Harry S, Lim P, Shafiee M, Nur Azurah A, et al. Outcome of molar pregnancies in Malaysia: a tertiary centre experience. J Obstet Gynaecol 2013;33(2):191-3. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23445147/
25. Oge T, Ozalp SS, Güngör T, Yildirim Y, Sanci M, Dogan A, et al. Hydatidiform mole in Turkey: results from six centers. J Reprod Med 2012;57(5-6):259-61. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22696823/
26. Zakaria A, Hemida R, Elrefaie W, Refaie E. Incidence and outcome of gestational trophoblastic disease in lower Egypt. Afr Health Sci 2020;20(1):73-82. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33402895/
27. Gockley AA, Melamed A, Joseph NT, Clapp M, Sun SY, Goldstein DP, et al. The effect of adolescence and advanced maternal age on the incidence of complete and partial molar pregnancy. Gynecol Oncol 2016;140(3):470-3. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26777992/
28. Savage P, Sita-Lumsden A, Dickson S, Iyer R, Everard J, Coleman R, et al. The relationship of maternal age to molar pregnancy incidence, risks for chemotherapy and subsequent pregnancy outcome. J Obstet Gynaecol 2013;33(4):406-11. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23654327/
29. Coullin P, Diatta A, Boufettal H, Feingold J, Leguern E, Candelier J. The involvement of the trans-generational effect in the high incidence of the hydatidiform mole in Africa. Placenta 2015;36(1):48-51. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25468544/
30. Shah S, Devi SL, Reddy SR, Mitra M, Sravanthi K. A Prospective Study of Molar Pregnancies in Teritiary Care Hospital.
31. Yamamoto E, Trinh TD, Sekiya Y, Tamakoshi K, Nguyen XP, Nishino K, et al. The management of hydatidiform mole using prophylactic chemotherapy and hysterectomy for high-risk patients decreased the incidence of gestational trophoblastic neoplasia in Vietnam: a retrospective observational study. Nagoya J Med Sci 2020;82(2):183. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32581399/
32. Agbari V, Hidayat YM, Kurniadi A, Salima S, Harsono AB, Suardi D, et al. Effectiveness and Efficiency Comparison of One-Day vs Eight-Day Methotrexate Protocols in Managing Low-Risk Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia. Int J Womens Health 2024;16:2077-85. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39649071/
33. Ozer M, Ozer PT, Karaca I, Karaca S, Ileri A, Budak A. A comparison of the clinical features of molar pregnancy in adolescents and adults. Pak J Med Sci 2024 May-Jun;40(5):846-850. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38827845/
34. Soto-Wright V, Bernstein M, Goldstein DP, Berkowitz RS. The changing clinical presentation of complete molar pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 1995;86(5):775-9. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7566847/
35. Nahar S, Begu T, Sharifa BS, Akhter J, Mostofa GG. Molar Pregnancy Analysis of 50 Cases. Sch Int J Obstet Gynec 2021;4(6):278-81.
36. Berkowitz RS, Goldstein DP, Bernstein MR. Natural history of partial molar pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 1985 Nov;66(5):677-81. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2414703/
37. Sekharan P, Sreedevi N, Radhadevi V, Beegam R, Raghavan J, Guhan B. Management of postmolar gestational trophoblastic disease with methotrexate and folinic acid: 15 years of experience. J Reprod Med 2006;51(10):835-40. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17086813/
38. Wang Q, Fu J, Hu L, Fang F, Xie L, Chen H, et al. Prophylactic chemotherapy for hydatidiform mole to prevent gestational trophoblastic neoplasia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017 Sep 11;9(9):CD007289. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28892119/
39. Hao J, Zhou W, Zhang M, Yu H, Zhang T, An R, et al. Direct comparisons of efficacy and safety between actinomycin-D and methotrexate in women with low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia: a meta-analysis of randomized and high-quality non-randomized studies. BMC Cancer 2021;21(1):1122. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34663255/
40. Jiang F, Guan CL, Jiao LZ, Xu T, Wan XR, Shi SS, et al. Efficacy and safety of biweekly single-dose actinomycin D versus multiday methotrexate in low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia: a prospective multicenter randomized trial. Ann Oncol 2025 Oct;36(10):1123-1131.  https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40543844/
41. Albright BB, Ellett T, Knochenhauer HE, Goins EC, Monuszko KA, Kaplan SJ, et al. Treatments and outcomes in high risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia: A systematic review and meta analysis. BJOG2023;130(5):443-53. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36648416/
Volume 9, Issue 4 - Serial Number 34
Autumn 2026
Pages 962-972

Figure 1. Yearly trend of molar pregnancy from March 2011 to June 2023.
Figure 1. Yearly trend of molar pregnancy from March 2011 to June 2023.